In a notable shift signaling the end of one era and the beginning of another in Lebanese-Palestinian relations, the Lebanese state has issued an unprecedented warning to Hamas—its first public and unequivocal warning of such firmness. Lebanon’s message was clear and decisive: Hamas must immediately cease all military and security activities on Lebanese territory or face immediate expulsion from the country.

Amid the heated election campaigns, many candidates sought to “predict the future” and gauge their chances of earning voters’ trust. To this end, a large number turned to specialized companies conducting statistics and opinion polls, hoping to obtain accurate results to guide their campaign efforts effectively. However, these hopes were soon dashed and turned into bitter disappointment. When the final results were announced, most of the candidates who had relied on these companies were shocked by the stark discrepancy between the forecasts they had been given and the reality they faced.

Amid the municipal elections held in some Lebanese areas, the Lebanese Forces (LF) party adopted a notably distinctive approach. Rather than limiting itself to traditional electoral competition, the party presented a comprehensive developmental vision and fostered a genuine partnership with the local community. So, what are the foundations upon which the LF built its approach to this electoral process? How did it implement its vision of decentralization on the ground? And what messages does this approach send regarding Lebanon’s political and developmental future?